Share

In a comprehensive, week-long test of seven new subcompact SUVs, the 2015 Subaru XV Crosstrek emerged as the clear winner, praised for its value, spacious interior, and comfortable ride. This highly competitive segment, filled with all-new models, forces buyers to weigh compromises between fuel economy, space, and driving dynamics. Our expert judges and real-world shoppers put the contenders through rigorous real-world driving, utility assessments, and back-to-back comparisons to determine which model delivers the best overall package.
Subcompact SUVs like the Honda HR-V and Chevrolet Trax offer a compelling blend of attributes for urban drivers. They provide more passenger and cargo space than subcompact cars and typically achieve better fuel economy than larger compact SUVs. However, our testing revealed significant trade-offs. The primary compromises often involve powertrain refinement, interior quality, and overall practicality. Models like the Mazda CX-3 excel in driving fun but suffer from a cramped cabin, while others prioritize space but feel underpowered. Understanding these trade-offs is crucial for making an informed purchase decision.
The Subaru XV Crosstrek scored 731 points out of a possible 1,000, winning over judges and our in-market shopper couple with its well-rounded capabilities. Its victory was secured by offering a superior blend of value, comfort, and utility.
Despite these strengths, judges noted the XV Crosstrek’s 2.0-liter engine is painfully slow, especially on inclines, and its continuously variable transmission (CVT) can produce a noticeable drone under acceleration.
The competition was tight, with each model having distinct highs and lows.
2. 2016 Fiat 500X (701 points) Praise centered on its fun-to-drive nature and stylish interior and exterior. Judges found its handling, braking, and acceleration to be top-notch, especially in Sport mode. The multimedia system was deemed the most intuitive of the group. However, its nine-speed automatic transmission was criticized for unpredictable shifting, and the ride quality was often harsh. The lack of all-wheel drive at the tested price point was also seen as a disadvantage.
3. 2016 Honda HR-V (687 points) The HR-V was hailed for its class-leading practicality and cavernous, configurable cargo area. Its low load floor and easy-to-fold "Magic Seat" system were major advantages. It also achieved excellent fuel economy. The biggest drawbacks were an unrefined and noisy powertrain and a frustrating touch-screen multimedia system that lacked physical volume and tuning knobs.
4. 2016 Mazda CX-3 (677 points) The Mazda CX-3 was the undisputed champion for driving enjoyment. Judges called it "amazing to drive" with a stylish, high-quality interior. Its main failing was a severe lack of interior space, making the rear seats nearly unusable for adults and complicating child-seat installation. Its practicality was questioned compared to a Mazda3 hatchback.
5. 2015 Jeep Renegade (651 points) The Renegade won points for its unique, rugged SUV styling and legitimate off-road potential thanks to its higher ground clearance and specialized drive modes. However, it was hampered by a sluggish, unrefined powertrain, poor fuel economy, and a brake pedal with an unsettling dead zone.
6. 2015 Nissan Juke (632 points) The Juke offered sports-car-like acceleration and handling, standing out with its fierce turbocharged engine. Its quirky styling was a love-it-or-hate-it affair. The major downsides were an extremely cramped interior, excessive road noise, and a very rough ride, limiting its appeal as a practical family vehicle.
7. 2016 Chevrolet Trax (566 points) The Trax's strengths were its spacious cabin with clever storage solutions and a gutsy turbocharged engine. Nevertheless, it finished last due to what judges called an unrefined, cheap-feeling interior that felt a decade behind the competition. The powertrain was also noted for being coarse and noisy.
Choosing the right subcompact SUV requires prioritizing your needs. Based on our assessment experience, here are the key takeaways:









